Measure D

Peanut cast his first ballot in a national election when he was 2.5 years old. He didn’t pull any levers, because that’s illegal. But he was sitting on my hip in a sling while I voted. And I’ve been taking both boys to vote, despite my preference for early voting, to every election since.

I want to teach them voting is important. And I focus on reading them ballot initiatives and discussing candidates’ positions so they understand why people vote different ways, and why every vote matters.

Express yo'self

Express yo’self

We’ve been seeing dozens of signs on front lawns, a handful of mailing supplements, and billboards aplenty. No on D. Yes on D. And Peanut wants to know what’s with all the hubbub, Bub.

I talked to him about the measure itself. Measure D is Berkeley’s Tax on Distributors of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages initiative. It’s been framed as Berkeley vs. Big Soda. And as local government sticking its nose where it doesn’t belong. The truth is somewhere in between, as is always the case with ballot measures.

I told Peanut that the basic idea is, if this measure passes, when you buy a soda, you have to pay more. A few cents. And that money accumulates and pays for the government’s costs for healthcare and services. That the people who wrote the bill want the cost of making a choice that hurts your body higher so they don’t have to pay so much later to help bodies that are hurt by soda.

It’s not that simple, of course. But he’s eight. Voting needs to be simplified a bit when you’re eight.

Since Measure D taxes sugar-sweetened beverages, it doesn’t tax artificially-sweetened beverages, which studies have suggested are actually worse for bodies than sugar-sweetened beverages are. And I told Peanut this, that the tax isn’t for all sodas, or all unhealthy drinks. Just sugar-added drinks.

He shrugged. “If it’s bad for you, and the tax is only a few cents, you should vote for it.”

“Maybe. But if the goal is public health, why not chemically-sweetened sodas? Why not juice? Why not tax sugar itself?”

“Because,” he said. “Sugar can be used a little or a lot, but in soda it’s a lot. And soda doesn’t have protein or fat, just sugar.”

Now we’re talking, buddy.

We’ve gotten too many mailers from the Beverage Industry, which whine that the measure doesn’t tax sugar-added coffee drinks. It does tax them if they’re in a bottle on a shelf, but not if you order one freshly made. But the goal is not taxing sugar; the goal is to tax sugar-sweetened processed beverages. Adding sugar to coffee later is optional, even with frothy $5 coffee drinks with syrups and whipped cream. You can order those without syrup or whipped cream. You can’t order a Coke or Pepsi without syrup, nor can you order a Starbucks bottled, shelf-stable thingamabob without sugar. Because those drinks are processed and packaged with the sugar already added, they are, in fact, different. Soda manufacturers don’t have to like that difference, but it is still a difference.

So what about the public health benefit of reduced consumption and increased tax revenue for health education?

There’s no way to determine that consumption will go down based on a tax. People still smoke, despite tobacco taxes. But they do smoke less. People still drive, despite heavily taxed gasoline. They drive a smidge less when gas is over $5 a gallon. But the increased revenue from Measure D’s penny-per-ounce tax pays for healthy-eating education, so ideally it will have an aggregate effect where each additional tax collected will further drive down consumption. It might wind up disproportionately taxing poor and less advantaged residents who will drink soda for a variety of reasons, including the low cost offered by federally-subsidized sugar priorities and lack of access to healthy alternatives at neighborhood markets.

I had Peanut read the mailers we keep getting. Clearly, the American Beverage Association seems terrified of this initiative, because they’re pouring enough money into mailings to pay for the education of all Berkeley students ($11 million at last count; I have no idea what that would pay for, but it’s a gobsmacking amount of money to preserve the low cost of soda and makes me mad enough to vote for D regardless of the nuances).

The marketing efforts focus on how residents must be confused about Measure D.

Confused? Marketer, Berkeley has one of the most educated populations in the country. Don’t you worry your sweet corporate head about our confusion. We’ll be okay. Across the Bay, San Francisco is deciding a similar measure. Don’t worry your CCM degree about them, either. They’re pretty smart, too.

my son trying to escape Berkeley for San Francisco

my son trying to escape Berkeley for San Francisco

What would make Measure D successful despite its limitations is if it cracks the door for governments to push food producers toward actual food rather than lab-facsimiles of food. Ideally, this will get us talking about federal subsidies for sugar and corn syrup. Hopefully, Measure D will spur a diet soda tax. Perhaps Measure D will get us talking about the artificial colors, banned in other countries and in U.S. cosmetics, but legal in our food. Maybe Measure D will get some effort behind the nutrition programs in Berkeley, where we’re teaching our kids to grow, prepare, and eat healthful foods but face smaller and smaller budgets.

If nothing else, Measure D has allowed some good talks in our house about legislation, about nutrition, and about why it’s important to vote.

Go vote! Unless you’re eight. In that case, wait ten years. Sorry.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Measure D

  1. Similar laws failed in NYC, but I found it interesting that NYC’s mayor, Michael Bloomberg, contributed money in your city to advocates of your measure. I think he also contributed money to something to do with taxing sugary Mexican import drinks, though I’m hazy on that one.

    In any case, Bloomberg is obviously still fighting the good fight on this one, despite personally losing it at home.

    Bringing kids to the polls is the best. The old ladies who work the polling stations (exclusively old ladies here, anyway) LOVE them. It’s fun.

    • The only thing I’ve learned about voting with kids, other than the adorability factor (we have mostly male poll workers at my polling place, but they still seem to dig my efforts to vote with children), is to have every single nuance figured out ahead of time. Woe to those who have a toddler and an undecided issue to debate,

      Yes, Bloomberg sent Berkeley’s Measure D supporters money. He also funded efforts behind the Mexican soda tax, which passed and has drastically reduced soda consumption in Mexico. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/18/us/michael-bloomberg-to-back-soda-tax-in-berkeley.html

      It will be interesting to see what happens in Berkeley and San Francisco today.

  2. I always bring my oldest with me to vote because I, too, want him to know why voting is so important. We are in Chicago, so our state doesn’t have the best history of honorable governors (quite a few have been jailed) so I’m sure that will spark some interesting conversations in the future. I was not well versed in the voting topics in your area–will be interested in the outcome. Happy last day of ugly campaign commercials! :)

  3. I am so very happy this election is over. There was so much mud slinging here in CT between the candidates for Governor that I really didn’t want to even vote, but I did regardless of the garbage.

    I am also very happy that there is another Mama out there teaching her little Minions about politics. That’s something my Mister’s family didn’t do, and I’m playing makeup by teaching him at the age of 29…and it’s confusing him more than it’s confusing the kids unfortunately.

    So brava to you! Your boys seem like they are going to grow up to be very smart men!!

    • Glad you voted despite the nonsense of the campaign! There is some justifiable “None of the Above because They’re All Jerks” sentiment, but at the base, we still have to take a stand on what those candidates believe in. And if they don’t believe what we do, we decide next time to run ourselves!
      Heaven help me if I have to run for office because the available candidates are so far from my positions that I can’t vote for them. Ugh.
      ;-)

Okay, now your turn...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s